|
Reported
Reasons for Not Using Windows-Based Software
The
most common reason for not using Windows-based
software was a lack of staff or financial resources to
perform implementation. In one case, the fact that
DOS-based data could not be automatically migrated into
the new Windows version was also a serious
deterrent. Some respondents also indicated a
hesitancy to move to a Windows-based version due to
reports from other users about technical difficulties with
the Windows version.
*
Please note: if you wish to print this page for your
reference, it is recommended that you print it in
landscape orientation on your printer, in order to see the
full width of the page.
| Software |
Reported
Usage Rate of DOS-Based or Other Text-Based
Software |
Not
Using Windows Due To Incompatibility of Data
Between Windows and Non-Windows Versions |
Not
Using Windows Due To Lack of Time To Implement
Windows Version |
Not
Using Windows Due To Lack of Staff and/or
Financial Resources To Implement Windows Version |
Not
Using Windows Due To Other Users Reporting
Technical Difficulties With Windows Version |
Not
Using Windows Due To Other Reasons (Specified) |
| CBORD |
2/4
(50%)
|
-
|
1/2
(50%)
|
1/2
(50%)
|
1/2
(50%)
|
- |
| Computrition |
2/4
(50%)
|
1/2
(50%)
|
- |
1/2
(50%)
|
1/2
(50%)
|
Unable
to afford Oracle Database Engine
1/2
(50%)
|
| FoodPerfect
version 2.1 |
1/1
(100%) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Unable
to run on a network, lack of telephone support,
and lack of support for referencing CFG and CDA
food choices.
1/1
(100%)
|
| Food
Smart version 5 (Sasquatch Software) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| NDS
(Nutrition Data System, University of Minnesota) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Nutritionist
Pro (First DataBank) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| NutriVision
(Component of HealthVision) |
1/1
(100%) |
- |
- |
1/1
(100%)
|
- |
- |
| ProNutra |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|