|
Reported
Reliability Ratings of Windows-Based Software
For
this survey question, reliability was
defined as, "the relative absence or presence of
"bugs" that cause software errors but not
crashes of the program." (Crashes and
"freeze-ups" of the program are addressed
through the ratings for software stability.)
*
Please note: if you wish to print this page for your
reference, it is recommended that you print it in
landscape orientation on your printer, in order to see
the full width of the page.
| Software |
Reported
Usage Rate of Windows Software |
Software
Rated as "Extremely Unreliable" |
Software
Rated as "Somewhat Unreliable" |
Software
Rated as "Adequate But Not Bug-Free" |
Software
Rated as "Extremely Reliable" |
| CBORD |
2/4
(50%)
|
-
|
-
|
2/2
(100%)
|
-
|
| Computrition |
2/4
(50%)
|
-
|
1/2
(50%)
|
1/2
(50%)
|
-
|
| FoodPerfect
version 2.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Food
Smart version 5 (Sasquatch Software) |
1/1
(100%) |
- |
- |
- |
1/1
(100%)
|
| NDS
(Nutrition Data System, University of Minnesota) |
1/1
(100%) |
- |
- |
- |
1/1
(100%)
|
| Nutritionist
Pro (First DataBank) |
1/1
(100%) |
1/1
(100%)
|
- |
- |
- |
| NutriVision
(Component of HealthVision) |
- |
- |
- |
-
|
- |
| ProNutra |
1/1
(100%) |
- |
- |
- |
1/1
(100%)
|
|